ADATA Swordfish 500GB Review — Budget PCIe 3.0 NVMe SSD
The ADATA Swordfish 500GB is a budget PCIe 3.0 NVMe SSD that offers double the capacity of its 250 GB sibling, giving budget builders more room for games and files without a significant price jump.

The ADATA Swordfish 500GB shares the same hardware foundation as its smaller sibling: the Realtek RTS5763DL controller paired with ADATA's own 3D TLC NAND, no dedicated DRAM cache, and reliance on the NVMe Host Memory Buffer protocol. The drive ships in a standard M.2 2280 form factor with a single-sided PCB, fitting comfortably in any desktop motherboard M.2 slot or laptop that supports NVMe drives.
ADATA rates the 500 GB model at 1,800 MB/s sequential reads and 1,200 MB/s sequential writes, with up to 180,000 IOPS for random 4K reads and writes. The 500 GB capacity offers a more practical storage footprint than the 250 GB variant, enough for the operating system, a handful of applications, and several games. The Swordfish also ships in 250 GB, 1 TB, and 2 TB capacities, with the larger variants offering proportionally higher write speeds.
The Swordfish occupies the entry-level tier of ADATA's NVMe lineup, sitting well below the XPG-branded performance series. Its positioning makes it a sensible upgrade from a 2.5-inch SATA SSD for budget systems, light office builds, or as a secondary game storage drive. Direct competitors include the Kingston NV2 500GB and the Team Group GX2, which offer similar specs at comparable prices.
The 500 GB model shares the same sustained write limitations as the 250 GB variant. Under heavy write loads, the small SLC cache exhausts quickly, and the underlying TLC NAND cannot sustain high write rates. StorageReview's testing of the Swordfish series found 4K random write performance collapsing to roughly 9,710 IOPS under sustained workloads, with significant latency spikes. This behaviour is invisible during light desktop use but noticeable during large file transfers.
✅ Storage Comparisons:
🚀 Performance and benchmarks
The ADATA Swordfish 500GB is rated for 1,800 MB/s sequential reads and 1,200 MB/s sequential writes, with up to 180,000 random read and write IOPS. These manufacturer-rated figures represent best-case performance with data already in the SLC cache. For everyday desktop tasks, the 1,800 MB/s reads deliver a roughly threefold improvement over SATA III SSDs, which max out around 550 MB/s. Boot times, application launches, and file browsing all benefit from the upgrade.
ADATA Swordfish 500 GB vs M.2 3.0 x 4 peers
Switch between sequential throughput and random IOPS to see how this drive stacks up against other M.2 3.0 x 4 SSDs in our database. The highlighted bar is the drive on this page — click any other bar to open that drive.
- ADATA SX 8800 Pro 512 GB: 3,500 MB/s read, 2,700 MB/s write
- ADATA SX 8800 Pro 1 TB: 3,500 MB/s read, 2,700 MB/s write
- ADATA XPG Spectrix S40G RGB 256 GB: 3,500 MB/s read, 3,000 MB/s write
- ADATA XPG Spectrix S40G RGB 512 GB: 3,500 MB/s read, 3,000 MB/s write
- ADATA Swordfish 500 GB (this drive): 1,800 MB/s read, 1,200 MB/s write
However, the Swordfish operates at roughly half the bandwidth of the PCIe 3.0 x4 interface, which tops out near 3,500 MB/s. Mainstream PCIe 3.0 drives like the WD Blue SN570 and Samsung 980 reach 3,000–3,500 MB/s reads and 2,500–3,000 MB/s writes, making the Swordfish look dated against current offerings. The HMB architecture also means that random I/O consistency depends on proper system-level HMB support.
Under sustained write loads, the Swordfish's entry-level hardware shows its limits. Independent testing found the drive's 4K random write performance dropping to approximately 9,710 IOPS under heavy workload stress, with extreme latency spikes and near-complete throughput stalls. The small SLC cache exhausts quickly when moving large files — video editors or anyone transferring tens of gigabytes at once will notice a sharp slowdown. For light use cases like web browsing, office productivity, and casual gaming, this behaviour is irrelevant. But the Swordfish is not a drive you would choose for sustained high-throughput workloads.
🖥️ Endurance and warranty
ADATA covers the Swordfish 500GB with a five-year limited warranty, capped at 330 TBW (terabytes written). At a typical consumer write workload of 20 GB per day, 330 TBW translates to approximately 45 years of use — far exceeding the five-year warranty window. Even at a heavier 50 GB per day, the drive would last roughly 18 years. The TBW rating scales proportionally with capacity across the Swordfish lineup, and 330 TBW is adequate for the drive's target audience of budget desktop users and casual gamers. ADATA provides the SSD Toolbox utility for monitoring drive health, checking remaining endurance, and applying firmware updates when available. The warranty is limited to manufacturing defects and does not cover drives that exceed their TBW rating within the warranty period.
📊 Specs
| Category | Value |
|---|---|
| Capacity [?] | 500 GB |
| Interface [?] | M.2 3.0 x 4 |
| Controller [?] | Realtek RTS5763DL |
| Memory type [?] | ADATA 3D TLC |
| DRAM [?] | Host Memory Buffer |
| Read speed (MB/s) [?] | 1800 |
| Write speed (MB/s) [?] | 1200 |
| Read IOPS [?] | 180000 |
| Write IOPS [?] | 180000 |
| Endurance (TBW) [?] | 330 |
| MTBF (million hours) [?] | 1.8 |
| Warranty (years) [?] | 5 |
Conclusion
The ADATA Swordfish 500GB is a sensible budget NVMe SSD for users upgrading from SATA or building an affordable system with more storage headroom than the 250 GB model. Its 1,800/1,200 MB/s speeds improve noticeably over SATA but lag well behind mainstream PCIe 3.0 alternatives like the Samsung 980 or WD Blue SN570. The drive's sustained write performance collapses under heavy loads, ruling it out for content creation workflows. It works well as a budget boot drive or secondary game storage, but buyers should compare pricing — if a faster drive costs only marginally more, it is the smarter long-term investment.
+ Pros
- 1,800 MB/s reads, 3x faster than SATA SSDs
- 500 GB capacity fits OS and several games
- Five-year warranty from ADATA
- HMB design keeps power draw low for laptops
- 330 TBW endurance suits daily desktop use
- Cons
- 1,800 MB/s reads well below PCIe 3.0 ceiling
- DRAM-less design with HMB dependency
- Sustained write performance collapses under heavy loads
- No included heatsink
- Larger capacities offer better speed per dollar
🛒 Buy this or similar SSD Storage:
✨ Video Review
50$ NVME SSD Adata SWORDFISH 500GB Unboxing