Kioxia RC500 500GB NVMe SSD Review (2026)

Posted on May 23, 2026 by Raymond Chen

The Kioxia RC500 500GB (originally branded as Toshiba OCZ) is a value-oriented PCIe 3.0 NVMe SSD with Toshiba TLC NAND and a DDR4 DRAM cache, offering 1,700 MB/s reads at an entry-level price.

Kioxia RC500 500GB NVMe SSD Review

Controller & Memory

The RC500 was originally launched under the Toshiba OCZ brand before the storage division was renamed to Kioxia. It uses a Toshiba in-house controller paired with Toshiba BiCS4 96-layer 3D TLC NAND and a DDR4 DRAM cache. The hardware foundation is solid for an entry-level NVMe drive: TLC NAND and DRAM cache provide consistent performance that QLC or DRAM-less alternatives cannot match.

The 500GB model is rated at 1,700 MB/s sequential reads and 1,600 MB/s sequential writes, with 355K random read IOPS and 410K random write IOPS. The RC500 range also includes a 1TB capacity. Unlike the newer Exceria line, the RC500 carries a shorter three-year warranty instead of five years.

The RC500 uses an M.2 2280 form factor. It targets budget builders upgrading from SATA storage who want NVMe speeds without paying the premium for higher-tier drives. The DRAM cache and TLC NAND are genuine advantages at this price point. Competitors include the Kingston A2000 500GB and the Crucial P2 500GB.

RC500 Performance & Benchmarks

The RC500 500GB is rated for 1,700 MB/s sequential reads and 1,600 MB/s sequential writes. These are entry-level PCIe 3.0 NVMe speeds — roughly three times faster than SATA SSDs (550 MB/s) in sequential reads. Random IO is rated at 355K read IOPS and 410K write IOPS, which is respectable for the price tier.

Performance comparison

Kioxia RC500 500 GB vs M.2 3.0 x 4 peers

Switch between sequential throughput and random IOPS to see how this drive stacks up against other M.2 3.0 x 4 SSDs in our database. The highlighted bar is the drive on this page — click any other bar to open that drive.

  • ADATA SX 8800 Pro 512 GB: 3,500 MB/s read, 2,700 MB/s write
  • ADATA SX 8800 Pro 1 TB: 3,500 MB/s read, 2,700 MB/s write
  • ADATA XPG Spectrix S40G RGB 256 GB: 3,500 MB/s read, 3,000 MB/s write
  • ADATA XPG Spectrix S40G RGB 512 GB: 3,500 MB/s read, 3,000 MB/s write
  • Kioxia RC500 500 GB (this drive): 1,700 MB/s read, 1,600 MB/s write

The DRAM cache ensures consistent random IO performance under multitasking workloads, giving the RC500 an advantage over DRAM-less competitors. The TLC NAND maintains consistent write speeds after the SLC cache fills, avoiding the dramatic write-speed collapse that QLC drives exhibit. For OS boot, application launches, and game loading, the RC500 delivers a noticeable improvement over SATA storage. Gaming load times are faster than SATA but not as quick as 3,400 MB/s NVMe drives.

Kioxia RC500 vs Competitors

See how the RC500 stacks up against other M.2 3.0 x 4 drives in our database:

Endurance, TBW & Warranty

The Kioxia RC500 carries a three-year limited warranty — shorter than the five-year coverage on Kioxia's newer Exceria and Exceria Plus lines. Kioxia does not publish a specific TBW rating for the RC500 500GB in most documentation. The three-year warranty period is the primary coverage metric. For a budget boot drive handling mostly reads, the warranty duration should be sufficient for most users. Warranty service is handled through Kioxia's RMA process or the retailer.

Kioxia RC500 500 GB Specifications

Category Value
Capacity [?] 500 GB
Interface [?] M.2 3.0 x 4
Controller [?] Phison PS5012-E12S
Memory type [?] Toshiba 96L 3D TLC
DRAM [?] Yes
Read speed (MB/s) [?] 1700
Write speed (MB/s) [?] 1600
Read IOPS [?] 355000
Write IOPS [?] 410000
Endurance (TBW) [?] 200
MTBF (million hours) [?] 1500000
Warranty (years) [?] 3

Verdict: Is the RC500 Worth It in 2026?

The Kioxia RC500 500GB is a budget NVMe SSD that delivers on its core promise: 1,700 MB/s reads with TLC NAND and DRAM cache at a low price. The DRAM and TLC combination is a genuine advantage over QLC-based competitors at similar prices. The main drawbacks are the shorter three-year warranty (versus five years on most competitors) and the older product positioning — Kioxia's own Exceria line has largely superseded the RC500 with similar speeds but better warranty coverage. For the price-sensitive buyer, the RC500 is a competent NVMe upgrade from SATA. For a small price increase, the Kioxia Exceria 500GB offers the same performance with a longer warranty.

+ Pros

  • 1,700 MB/s reads — three times faster than SATA
  • TLC NAND with DRAM cache at a budget price
  • Toshiba/Kioxia in-house controller with native NAND
  • Consistent write performance — no QLC collapse

- Cons

  • Three-year warranty — shorter than the five-year industry standard
  • No published TBW endurance rating
  • Superseded by the Kioxia Exceria with same speed and longer warranty
  • 1,700 MB/s reads — entry-level NVMe speed
  • Limited availability as the product ages out

3.1 / 5 · 41 votes

Buy this or similar SSD Storage:

Samsung 980 Pro 2 TB

-57% $165
List Price: $379.99

Buy on Amazon

Video Review

Toshiba KIOXIA RC500 500GB M 2 opinion

Frequently Asked Questions

The RC500 500GB delivers 1,700 MB/s reads, providing faster game load times than SATA SSDs. The 500GB capacity holds the OS plus 6–10 AAA games. The TLC NAND and DRAM cache ensure consistent performance during game installations. For budget gaming builds, the RC500 is adequate. However, the newer Kioxia Exceria offers similar performance with a five-year warranty instead of three, making it the better choice when available at a similar price.

Yes. The RC500 includes a DDR4 DRAM cache that supports the Toshiba in-house controller's flash translation layer. The DRAM provides consistent random IO performance under multitasking workloads, giving the RC500 an advantage over DRAM-less budget NVMe drives that rely on Host Memory Buffer.

The RC500 was launched as a value-oriented product under the Toshiba OCZ brand, with a three-year warranty to reduce warranty liability costs. Kioxia's newer Exceria and Exceria Plus lines come with five-year warranties, reflecting both industry trends and the company's updated product positioning. The shorter warranty is the RC500's main disadvantage compared to current alternatives.

The RC500 and Exceria offer similar 1,700/1,600 MB/s read/write speeds, both using TLC NAND with DRAM cache. The Exceria uses newer BiCS5 96-layer NAND versus the RC500's BiCS4. The key difference is warranty: the Exceria has five years versus the RC500's three years. The Exceria also has a published TBW rating. If priced the same, the Exceria is the better choice. If the RC500 is significantly cheaper, it remains a competent drive.

Yes. The RC500 reads at 1,700 MB/s versus SATA's 550 MB/s ceiling — roughly three times faster. Random IO is also substantially better thanks to the NVMe protocol. OS boot times and application launches are noticeably snappier. For anyone upgrading from a SATA SSD, the RC500 delivers a clear performance improvement at a budget price point.

Kioxia does not publish a specific TBW (terabytes written) rating for the RC500 500GB. The drive is covered by a three-year limited warranty. As a TLC-based drive with DRAM cache handling mostly read workloads as a boot drive, endurance should not be a practical concern during the warranty period. The lack of a published TBW figure is a drawback compared to Kioxia's Exceria line, which specifies TBW ratings for each capacity.

Comments

  • Be the first to comment.

Comments are reviewed before they appear.

Other Kioxia models:

Similar SSD:

MyDigitalSSD SBXe Review

MyDigitalSSD SBXe

480 GB / M.2 3.0 x 4

Kioxia RD500 Review

Kioxia RD500

500 GB / M.2 3.0 x 4

Corsair MP510 Review

Corsair MP510

480 GB / M.2 3.0 x 4

Samsung 970 Pro Review

Samsung 970 Pro

512 GB / M.2 3.0 x 4

Kioxia XG6-P Review

Kioxia XG6-P

512 GB / M.2 3.0 x 4