HP EX950 512GB NVMe SSD Review — PCIe 3.0 (2026)

Posted on May 17, 2026 by Raymond Chen

The HP EX950 512GB is a PCIe 3.0 NVMe SSD built on the Silicon Motion SM2262EN controller and Micron 64-layer TLC NAND, offering 3,500 MB/s reads and 320 TBW endurance in a proven mid-range platform.

HP EX950 512GB NVMe SSD Review — PCIe 3.0

Controller & Memory

The EX950 is produced by BIWIN Storage under HP's brand authorization. Under the label sits a rebranded Silicon Motion SM2262ENG controller paired with Micron 64-layer 3D TLC NAND and a Nanya or Micron DDR3 DRAM cache. The SM2262EN is one of the better PCIe 3.0 controllers, known for strong random IO and consistent sustained writes.

The 512GB model is rated at 3,500 MB/s sequential reads and 2,900 MB/s sequential writes, with 410K random read IOPS and 380K random write IOPS. Endurance is 320 TBW. The EX950 range also includes 256GB, 1TB, and 2TB capacities with the same peak read/write speeds but scaling endurance — 160 TBW, 650 TBW, and 1,300 TBW respectively.

HP's firmware went through a notable revision: early EX950 units shipped with firmware that underperformed in some benchmarks, and HP later issued an update (42A7T36A) that significantly improved real-world performance. Buyers should verify their firmware version using HP's support tools. The drive competes with the Samsung 970 EVO Plus 500GB, the ADATA SX8200 Pro 512GB, and the WD Black SN750 500GB.

EX950 Performance & Benchmarks

The HP EX950 512GB is rated for 3,500 MB/s sequential reads and 2,900 MB/s sequential writes. With the updated firmware, independent reviewers found the EX950 competitive with — and in some real-life tests faster than — the Samsung 970 Pro, which is high praise for a drive at this price point. The SM2262EN controller's strength is sustained random IO, where it holds consistent performance even as the drive fills.

Performance comparison

HP EX950 512 GB vs M.2 3.0 x 4 peers

Switch between sequential throughput and random IOPS to see how this drive stacks up against other M.2 3.0 x 4 SSDs in our database. The highlighted bar is the drive on this page — click any other bar to open that drive.

  • HP EX950 512 GB (this drive): 3,500 MB/s read, 2,900 MB/s write
  • ADATA SX 8800 Pro 512 GB: 3,500 MB/s read, 2,700 MB/s write
  • ADATA SX 8800 Pro 1 TB: 3,500 MB/s read, 2,700 MB/s write
  • ADATA XPG Spectrix S40G RGB 256 GB: 3,500 MB/s read, 3,000 MB/s write
  • ADATA XPG Spectrix S40G RGB 512 GB: 3,500 MB/s read, 3,000 MB/s write

The 512GB model has fewer NAND die than the 1TB and 2TB variants, so sustained write throughput after SLC cache exhaustion is lower — roughly 1,200–1,500 MB/s versus 1,800–2,200 MB/s on the larger models. The SLC cache on the 512GB model absorbs roughly 30–50 GB of burst writes at full speed before folding to TLC. For a boot and application drive that handles mostly reads, the cache behavior is rarely a factor. Gaming load times are fast and consistent.

HP EX950 vs Competitors

See how the EX950 stacks up against other M.2 3.0 x 4 drives in our database:

Endurance, TBW & Warranty

HP rates the EX950 512GB at 320 TBW with a five-year limited warranty. At a typical consumer workload of 20–30 GB per day, the endurance budget covers 29 to 43 years. The drive carries a 2 million hour MTBF rating, a population-level reliability estimate. HP provides SSD management tools for health monitoring and firmware updates — important given the early firmware performance issues that were later resolved. Warranty service is handled through HP's RMA process.

HP EX950 512 GB Specifications

Category Value
Capacity [?] 512 GB
Interface [?] M.2 3.0 x 4
Controller [?] Silicon Motion SM2262EN
Memory type [?] Micron 64L 3D TLC
DRAM [?] Nanya or Micron 512 - 2TB DDR3
Read speed (MB/s) [?] 3500
Write speed (MB/s) [?] 2900
Read IOPS [?] 410000
Write IOPS [?] 380000
Endurance (TBW) [?] 320
MTBF (million hours) [?] 2
Warranty (years) [?] 5

Verdict: Is the EX950 Worth It in 2026?

The HP EX950 512GB is a well-built PCIe 3.0 NVMe SSD that delivers strong 3,500 MB/s reads and competitive real-world performance, especially with the updated firmware. The SM2262EN controller and Micron TLC NAND are a proven combination, and the 320 TBW endurance provides comfortable headroom for a boot drive. The main caveat is the early firmware issue — buyers should verify and update firmware if needed. For the price, the EX950 512GB competes effectively with the Samsung 970 EVO Plus and WD Black SN750. Those who need more capacity and endurance should consider the EX950 1TB, which offers doubled storage and 650 TBW for a modest price increase.

+ Pros

  • 3,500 MB/s reads and 2,900 MB/s writes on PCIe 3.0
  • SM2262EN controller with strong random IO performance
  • Micron 64-layer TLC NAND — consistent sustained writes
  • 320 TBW endurance with 5-year warranty
  • DDR3 DRAM cache for reliable FTL management

- Cons

  • Early firmware had performance issues — verify update
  • 512GB may be tight for combined OS and game library
  • HP-branded but manufactured by BIWIN — limited brand heritage in SSDs
  • Double-sided PCB may limit slim-laptop compatibility
  • PCIe 3.0 — surpassed by Gen4 drives

3.6 / 5 · 115 votes

Buy this or similar SSD Storage:

Samsung 980 Pro 2 TB

-57% $165
List Price: $379.99

Buy on Amazon

Video Review

HP EX 950 SSD M.2 NVME | The FASTEST SSD i have Used 😝 3500 MB/S

Frequently Asked Questions

The EX950 512GB delivers 3,500 MB/s reads and 410K random read IOPS, providing fast and consistent game load times. The 512GB capacity holds the OS plus 6–10 AAA games. The SM2262EN controller maintains performance even as the drive fills, which is important for a gaming drive that frequently receives large game updates. With the updated firmware, the EX950 is competitive with the Samsung 970 EVO Plus in gaming workloads.

Yes. The EX950 uses DDR3 DRAM (Nanya or Micron) to support the Silicon Motion SM2262EN controller's flash translation layer. The DRAM size varies by capacity — the 512GB model has a proportionally smaller DRAM chip than the 1TB and 2TB variants. DRAM cache improves random write consistency and sustained performance under mixed workloads.

The HP EX950 512GB is rated at 320 TBW (terabytes written), covered by a five-year limited warranty. At a typical consumer workload of 20–30 GB per day, the endurance budget covers 29 to 43 years. For a boot and game drive that handles mostly reads, endurance is well within comfortable limits for the warranty period.

If the drive is running early firmware (version SS0411B), updating to the revised firmware (42A7T36A) is recommended. TechPowerUp's testing showed the firmware update resolved performance issues in some benchmarks and improved real-world write consistency. Use HP's SSD management tool or check the HP support website for the latest firmware version and update instructions.

Both are PCIe 3.0 NVMe drives with TLC NAND and DRAM cache. The Samsung 970 EVO Plus uses Samsung's in-house Phoenix controller and Samsung TLC, while the EX950 uses the Silicon Motion SM2262EN with Micron TLC. Peak speeds are similar at 3,500 MB/s reads. The Samsung has broader brand recognition and a more established firmware track record. The EX950 is typically priced lower. Both deliver strong real-world performance — the choice often comes down to price and availability.

The EX950 512GB uses a double-sided M.2 2280 form factor, meaning components are mounted on both faces of the PCB. Most standard laptops accommodate double-sided M.2 drives, but some ultra-thin models may have clearance restrictions. Check the laptop's M.2 slot height specification before purchasing. Power draw is moderate for a PCIe 3.0 performance drive.

Comments

  • Be the first to comment.

Comments are reviewed before they appear.

Other HP models:

Similar SSD:

MyDigitalSSD SBXe Review

MyDigitalSSD SBXe

480 GB / M.2 3.0 x 4

Kioxia RD500 Review

Kioxia RD500

500 GB / M.2 3.0 x 4

Corsair MP510 Review

Corsair MP510

480 GB / M.2 3.0 x 4

Samsung 970 Pro Review

Samsung 970 Pro

512 GB / M.2 3.0 x 4

Kioxia XG6-P Review

Kioxia XG6-P

512 GB / M.2 3.0 x 4