Transcend PCIe SSD 110S 512GB Review

Posted on May 17, 2026 by Raymond Chen

The Transcend PCIe SSD 110S 512GB is a budget NVMe drive that offers a step up from SATA speeds at a price point that competes with entry-level SSDs.

Transcend PCIe SSD 110S 512GB Review

Transcend positions the PCIe SSD 110S (also marketed as the MTE110S) as an entry-level NVMe drive for users upgrading from SATA SSDs. The 512GB capacity represents the top of the 110S lineup, which also includes 128GB and 256GB variants. All three share the same 1,700 MB/s read and 1,500 MB/s write ratings.

The 110S uses a DRAM-less controller architecture, relying on the NVMe Host Memory Buffer (HMB) feature to borrow system RAM for mapping tables. This is a cost-saving measure common in budget NVMe drives, and it works well for typical desktop workloads. The drive uses 3D NAND flash in the M.2 2280 single-sided form factor, fitting into any desktop or laptop with an NVMe M.2 slot.

The 512GB capacity is large enough for a Windows 11 installation plus a moderate collection of applications and a few games. Users with large game libraries or media collections should consider it a boot drive paired with secondary storage rather than a standalone solution. Transcend rates the endurance at 800 TBW, which is generous for this segment and more than adequate for typical consumer use over the 5-year warranty period.

🚀 Performance and benchmarks

The Transcend PCIe SSD 110S 512GB is rated at 1,700 MB/s sequential reads and 1,500 MB/s sequential writes. These speeds place it firmly in the entry-level NVMe tier, roughly 3x faster than SATA SSDs in sequential throughput but well below the 3,000+ MB/s that premium PCIe 3.0 drives achieve. The gap versus SATA is most noticeable during large file transfers, OS installation, and game loading.

Performance comparison

Transcend PCIe SSD 110S 512 GB vs PCIe 3.0 x 4 peers

Switch between sequential throughput and random IOPS to see how this drive stacks up against other PCIe 3.0 x 4 SSDs in our database. The highlighted bar is the drive on this page — click any other bar to open that drive.

  • Asura Genesis Xtreme 256 GB: 3,400 MB/s read, 3,000 MB/s write
  • Asura Genesis Xtreme 512 GB: 3,400 MB/s read, 3,000 MB/s write
  • Asura Genesis Xtreme 1 TB: 3,400 MB/s read, 3,000 MB/s write
  • Asura Genesis Xtreme 2 TB: 3,400 MB/s read, 3,000 MB/s write
  • Transcend PCIe SSD 110S 512 GB (this drive): 1,700 MB/s read, 1,500 MB/s write

The DRAM-less architecture means random 4K performance is modest compared to drives with dedicated DRAM caches. For typical desktop workloads like web browsing, document editing, and application launches, the difference is barely noticeable. The drive leverages the NVMe Host Memory Buffer to maintain acceptable random I/O consistency. In sustained write scenarios, the SLC cache absorbs initial bursts before performance settles to native NAND write speeds.

For users moving from a SATA SSD or mechanical HDD, the 110S 512GB delivers a meaningful improvement in everyday responsiveness. Boot times, application launches, and file operations all feel snappier. However, users accustomed to high-end NVMe drives like the Samsung 970 EVO Plus or WD Black SN750 will notice the lower sequential throughput and reduced random I/O performance under heavy multitasking.

🖥️ Endurance and warranty

Transcend backs the PCIe SSD 110S series with a 5-year limited warranty. The 512GB model is rated at 800 TBW, which is the total bytes written endurance metric. In practical terms, writing 50 GB per day would take roughly 43 years to reach 800 TBW. Even power users writing 100 GB daily would need over 21 years to exhaust the endurance rating.

The 5-year warranty is standard for consumer NVMe drives and matches offerings from Samsung, WD, and Crucial. Transcend handles warranty claims through its regional support channels. The drive includes built-in S.M.A.R.T. health monitoring and wear-leveling to distribute writes evenly across NAND cells, maximizing the effective lifespan.

📊 Specs

Category Value
Capacity [?] 512 GB
Interface [?] PCIe 3.0 x 4
Controller [?] n/a
Memory type [?] MLC
DRAM [?] n/a
Read speed (MB/s) [?] 1700
Write speed (MB/s) [?] 1500
Read IOPS [?] n/a
Write IOPS [?] n/a
Endurance (TBW) [?] 800
MTBF (million hours) [?] n/a
Warranty (years) [?] 5

Conclusion

The Transcend PCIe SSD 110S 512GB is a serviceable entry-level NVMe drive that delivers a tangible upgrade over SATA SSDs without a premium price tag. The 1,700/1,500 MB/s sequential speeds are modest by NVMe standards but represent a real improvement in daily use. Buy it if you are on a strict budget and need more capacity than speed, or if you are upgrading an older system from SATA to NVMe for the first time.

Skip it if you can spend a bit more, because drives like the Kingston NV2, WD Blue SN580, or Team Group MP33 offer better performance per dollar in the current market. The 110S 512GB is best suited as a drop-in upgrade for laptops or prebuilt systems where the cheapest NVMe option is the priority.

+ Pros

  • 1,700 MB/s reads, 1,500 MB/s writes — 3x faster than SATA
  • 512GB capacity sufficient for OS plus moderate application library
  • 800 TBW endurance generous for the price segment
  • M.2 2280 single-sided form factor fits laptops
  • 5-year warranty

- Cons

  • DRAM-less design limits random I/O consistency
  • 1,700 MB/s well below premium PCIe 3.0 drives (3,000+ MB/s)
  • Entry-level performance tier for NVMe
  • No dedicated software toolbox from Transcend

🛒 Buy this or similar SSD Storage:

Samsung 980 Pro 2 Tb

-57% $165
List Price: $379.99

Buy on Amazon

✨ Video Review

Best Budget NVMe SSD? - Transcend MTE220S Review

⁉️ FAQ

It is adequate for gaming but not ideal. The 1,700 MB/s read speed is fast enough for game loading, and the 512GB capacity can hold a few modern titles alongside Windows. However, the DRAM-less architecture may cause minor stutter in games that stream assets heavily. For budget gaming builds, it works, but drives with DRAM caches like the Samsung 970 EVO Plus or Kingston A2000 deliver more consistent frame pacing in open-world titles.

No. The 110S uses a DRAM-less controller that relies on the NVMe Host Memory Buffer (HMB) feature. HMB borrows a small portion of system RAM to store the flash translation layer mapping tables. This approach works well for typical desktop use but can introduce slight latency under heavy random write workloads compared to drives with dedicated DRAM. The trade-off is lower cost, which is why most budget NVMe drives use this architecture.

The Transcend 110S is believed to use a Silicon Motion SM2263XT or similar entry-level NVMe controller. This is a popular DRAM-less controller found in many budget NVMe drives from various manufacturers. It supports PCIe 3.0 x4 and NVMe 1.3, providing adequate performance for everyday computing tasks. The controller handles basic SLC caching and wear leveling but lacks the sophisticated thermal management and over-provisioning features of higher-end controllers.

Physically it fits the PS5 M.2 slot and will function, but it is not recommended for PS5 use. Sony recommends PCIe 4.0 NVMe drives with at least 5,500 MB/s read speeds. The 110S is a PCIe 3.0 drive limited to 1,700 MB/s, which is far below the PS5 internal storage performance. For PS5 expansion, look at PCIe 4.0 drives like the WD Black SN850X or Samsung 980 Pro with at least 1TB capacity.

The 110S is roughly 3x faster than SATA SSDs in sequential throughput (1,700 vs 550 MB/s). In real-world use, this translates to faster large file transfers and quicker game installations. Boot times and application launches are modestly improved but not dramatically different, since those workloads are dominated by random 4K reads where NVMe and SATA drives are closer in performance. The main advantage of choosing the 110S over a SATA SSD is the M.2 form factor, which saves space and eliminates cable clutter.

512GB is tight for most users in 2026. Windows 11 consumes 80-100 GB with updates and hibernation files. Common applications like Microsoft Office, a web browser, and creative tools add another 30-50 GB. This leaves roughly 350 GB for games and media. Modern AAA games routinely exceed 100 GB each, so you can store 2-3 large titles before running low. Consider 1TB the comfortable minimum for most users, with 512GB reserved for budget builds or dedicated OS drives paired with secondary storage.
There are no comments yet.
Your message is required.