Crucial P2 500GB NVMe SSD Review

Posted on May 23, 2026 by Raymond Chen

The Crucial P2 500 GB is a budget DRAM-less NVMe SSD that was originally competent, but a silent QLC NAND swap under the same model number means buyers may receive a drastically slower drive than reviews describe.

Crucial P2 500GB NVMe SSD Review

The P2 uses Phison's E13T DRAM-less NVMe controller (28nm, single-core at 667 MHz, four NAND channels) with Micron 96-layer TLC NAND on the original revision. It relies on NVMe's Host Memory Buffer (HMB) for flash translation layer tables. The 500 GB capacity uses four NAND packages with 512Gb dies.

The specs in this article reflect the original TLC revision. The critical buyer warning: Crucial silently swapped the TLC flash for QLC NAND in later production runs without changing the product name or part number. The QLC revision is dramatically slower -- Tom's Hardware found sustained writes at 40 MB/s (hard drive territory) and real-world read speeds roughly halved.

The 500 GB model's rated write speed of 940 MB/s on the TLC revision is actually lower than the 250 GB model's 1,150 MB/s, which is unusual. The P2 competes with the WD Blue SN550 and Kingston NV2. The SN550 is the safer choice with consistent quality across revisions.

🚀 Performance and benchmarks

On the original TLC revision, the 500 GB P2 is rated for up to 2,300 MB/s sequential reads and 940 MB/s sequential writes over PCIe 3.0 x4, with 95,000 random read IOPS and 215,000 random write IOPS. The read IOPS are notably low -- lower than the 250 GB model's 170K -- and the write speed of 940 MB/s is below the 250 GB model's 1,150 MB/s.

Performance comparison

Crucial P2 500 GB vs M.2 3.0 x 4 peers

Switch between sequential throughput and random IOPS to see how this drive stacks up against other M.2 3.0 x 4 SSDs in our database. The highlighted bar is the drive on this page — click any other bar to open that drive.

  • ADATA SX 8800 Pro 512 GB: 3,500 MB/s read, 2,700 MB/s write
  • ADATA SX 8800 Pro 1 TB: 3,500 MB/s read, 2,700 MB/s write
  • ADATA XPG Spectrix S40G RGB 256 GB: 3,500 MB/s read, 3,000 MB/s write
  • ADATA XPG Spectrix S40G RGB 512 GB: 3,500 MB/s read, 3,000 MB/s write
  • Crucial P2 500 GB (this drive): 2,300 MB/s read, 940 MB/s write

The E13T controller's firmware prioritizes write latency over read responsiveness, which hurts performance in read-heavy workloads like game loading. The small Dynamic Write Acceleration SLC cache fills quickly on the 500 GB model, and direct-to-TLC writes are slow.

The QLC revision changes the picture entirely. Sustained writes drop to 40 MB/s, read speeds halve in real-world tests, and overall performance is four times slower than the TLC version in file transfer tests. Tom's Hardware issued a "do not recommend" verdict for the P2 after the QLC swap was discovered.

🖥️ Endurance and warranty

Crucial rates the 500 GB P2 for 300 TBW of write endurance under a five-year limited warranty. The drive includes RAID ECC and Phison fourth-generation LDPC error correction with multiple adaptation levels. Integrated power loss immunity provides some protection against data corruption during unexpected shutdowns. The endurance rating applies to both TLC and QLC revisions.

📊 Specs

Category Value
Capacity [?] 500 GB
Interface [?] M.2 3.0 x 4
Controller [?] Phison E13
Memory type [?] Micron TLC
DRAM [?] HMB
Read speed (MB/s) [?] 2300
Write speed (MB/s) [?] 940
Read IOPS [?] 95000
Write IOPS [?] 215000
Endurance (TBW) [?] 300
MTBF (million hours) [?] 1500000
Warranty (years) [?] 5

Conclusion

The Crucial P2 500 GB cannot be recommended due to the silent QLC NAND swap. Even the original TLC revision was mediocre compared to the WD Blue SN550, with lower write speeds and read responsiveness. The QLC revision is substantially worse, with hard-drive-level sustained writes. For budget NVMe storage, the WD Blue SN550 offers more consistent performance, better-documented specs, and no history of silent hardware changes.

+ Pros

  • Low price for NVMe storage
  • 300 TBW endurance on the TLC revision
  • Single-sided M.2 2280
  • Five-year warranty
  • Integrated power loss immunity

- Cons

  • Silent QLC NAND swap ruins performance
  • QLC revision: 40 MB/s sustained writes
  • Cannot distinguish TLC from QLC at purchase
  • 940 MB/s writes (TLC) below the 250GB model
  • Very low 95K random read IOPS
  • Read latency worse than SATA SSDs in some tests

🛒 Buy this or similar SSD Storage:

Samsung 980 Pro 2 TB

-57% $165
List Price: $379.99

Buy on Amazon

✨ Video Review

Crucial P2 500GB NvMe SSD Review

⁉️ FAQ

Not recommended. On the original TLC revision, the P2 500 GB is an adequate budget drive, but game load times trail even some SATA SSDs due to poor read latency optimization. On the QLC revision (which is what most buyers will receive now), performance is significantly worse. Tom's Hardware issued a \"do not recommend\" for the P2 after discovering the QLC swap.

Crucial replaced the TLC NAND in the P2 with QLC NAND without changing the product name or model number. The QLC revision has sustained write speeds of approximately 40 MB/s (slower than most hard drives), roughly half the read speed of the TLC version in real-world tests, and overall performance about four times worse than the TLC revision. There is no way to determine which version is in a sealed box.

No. The P2 uses Phison's E13T DRAM-less controller with NVMe Host Memory Buffer (HMB). The E13T's firmware is optimized for write performance, which hurts read responsiveness. In game load tests, the P2 500 GB was slower than the Crucial MX500 SATA SSD.

The 500 GB P2 is rated for 300 TBW (terabytes written) under a five-year limited warranty. This applies to both TLC and QLC revisions. At 15 GB of writes per day, 300 TBW translates to roughly 55 years of use on paper. The QLC revision may exhaust endurance faster due to higher write amplification.

The WD Blue SN550 is the better budget NVMe choice. It offers consistent performance, no history of silent hardware revisions, and better real-world responsiveness. For slightly more budget, the Samsung 970 EVO Plus provides DRAM-equipped performance. Both are safer choices than the P2.
There are no comments yet.
Your message is required.

Other Crucial models:

Similar SSD:

Drevo D1 Xtreme Review

Drevo D1 Xtreme

512 GB / PCIe 3.0 x 4

Kioxia BG4 Review

Kioxia BG4

512 GB / M.2 3.0 x 4 2230 S3

Kioxia XG8 Review

Kioxia XG8

512 GB / M.2 4.0 x 4

Integral Ultima Pro X3 Review

Integral Ultima Pro X3

512 GB / M.2 4.0 x 4

ADATA XPG SX6000 Pro Review

ADATA XPG SX6000 Pro

512 GB / M.2 3.0 x 4