Team Group P30 240GB — Budget Boot Drive PCIe 3.0 NVMe

Posted on May 17, 2026 by Raymond Chen

The Team Group P30 240GB is a bare-minimum NVMe boot drive that trades capacity for cost, making it a practical drop-in upgrade for aging SATA-based desktops and laptops on a tight budget.

Team Group P30 240GB — Budget Boot Drive PCIe 3.0 NVMe

The Team Group P30 is an entry-level M.2 2280 NVMe SSD built on the PCIe 3.0 x4 interface. Team Group published limited technical documentation for this model — the NAND type is not specified in retail listings, and the controller is not publicly identified — but the drive's performance envelope places it in the DRAM-less, HMB-equipped budget segment. The 240 GB capacity is the smaller of the two SKUs offered, sitting below the 480 GB variant. The single-sided M.2 2280 PCB ensures fitment in thin laptops and ultrabooks that cannot accept double-sided drives.

At 240 GB, formatted capacity lands around 223 GB in Windows. This is enough for the operating system and essential applications but leaves little room beyond that. The drive is best deployed as a dedicated boot disk in an older system, paired with a larger SATA SSD or hard drive for bulk storage. Users who need a single-drive solution for both OS and applications should consider the 480 GB variant or a competing 500 GB-class drive instead. The P30 was positioned as a cost-minimized SKU for system integrators and budget-conscious buyers — its undocumented internal components reflect that focus on price over transparency.

In the entry-level PCIe 3.0 segment the P30 competes against the WD Blue SN550 250 GB, Crucial P2 250 GB, and Kingston A2000 250 GB. Each of these competitors publishes more complete specifications — NAND type, controller architecture, endurance ratings — and most carry a 5-year warranty versus the P30's 3 years. The P30's case rests entirely on price: if it undercuts the documented alternatives by a meaningful margin, the performance is adequate for boot-drive duty. If priced similarly to the SN550 or A2000, the lack of published specifications makes the P30 difficult to recommend over the more transparent options.

✅ Storage Comparisons:

Best 4 TB SSD Best Deal of 1 TB SSDs NVME Best PCIe 4.0 SSD Drive

🚀 Performance and benchmarks

Team Group rates the 240 GB P30 at up to 2,500 MB/s sequential reads and 1,350 MB/s sequential writes on the PCIe 3.0 x4 interface. These numbers are identical to the 480 GB variant on paper, though real-world sustained write performance on the 240 GB model will be lower due to having half the NAND dies to parallelize writes across — a limitation common to all small-capacity SSDs, not specific to the P30. The rated random performance of 180,000 IOPS read and 140,000 IOPS write is adequate for boot-drive workloads where random read latency dominates the user experience.

Performance comparison

Team Group P30 240 GB vs PCIe 3.0 x 4 peers

Switch between sequential throughput and random IOPS to see how this drive stacks up against other PCIe 3.0 x 4 SSDs in our database. The highlighted bar is the drive on this page — click any other bar to open that drive.

Asura Genesis Xtreme 256 GB: 3,400 MB/s read, 3,000 MB/s write
Asura Genesis Xtreme 512 GB: 3,400 MB/s read, 3,000 MB/s write
Asura Genesis Xtreme 1 TB: 3,400 MB/s read, 3,000 MB/s write
Asura Genesis Xtreme 2 TB: 3,400 MB/s read, 3,000 MB/s write
Team Group P30 240 GB (this drive): 2,500 MB/s read, 1,350 MB/s write

The 240 GB capacity imposes practical constraints beyond the headline speed numbers. With less spare area for the controller to manage wear leveling and garbage collection, sustained performance under heavy mixed workloads may degrade more noticeably than on the 480 GB variant. For the drive's intended role — operating system boot, application launches, and light file operations — these constraints are unlikely to surface in day-to-day use. The P30 clears the bar for what makes an NVMe upgrade worthwhile over SATA: faster boot times, snappier application launches, and lower file-transfer latency.

Users should keep expectations aligned with the price. The P30 is not a performance drive — it is a cost-reduced bridge from SATA to NVMe for systems that cannot justify the expense of a higher-spec SSD. In that role, the 2,500 MB/s reads and NVMe latency deliver the core benefit without the premium.

🖥️ Endurance and warranty

Team Group backs the P30 with a 3-year limited warranty, standard for entry-level SSDs but shorter than the 5-year coverage offered by most mid-range drives. The endurance figure listed in third-party databases is 380 TBW for the 240 GB model — a number that, if accurate, would represent exceptionally high endurance for a drive of this capacity and is likely a data-entry artefact at the source level. Typical endurance for a 250 GB-class consumer SSD in this price tier would be 80 to 150 TBW. Without corroborating documentation from Team Group, this endurance figure should be treated as unverified. The MTBF is rated at 2 million hours, a population-level statistic reflecting expected reliability under normal conditions rather than a guarantee for any individual unit. Warranty service is handled through Team Group's standard RMA process; buyers should retain proof of purchase.

📊 Specs

Category	Value
Capacity [?]	240 GB
Interface [?]	PCIe 3.0 x 4
Controller [?]	n/a
Memory type [?]	n/a
DRAM [?]	n/a
Read speed (MB/s) [?]	2500
Write speed (MB/s) [?]	1350
Read IOPS [?]	180000
Write IOPS [?]	140000
Endurance (TBW) [?]	380
MTBF (million hours) [?]	2
Warranty (years) [?]	3

Conclusion

The Team Group P30 240 GB does one thing and does it passably: it puts a functional NVMe boot drive in a PCIe 3.0 system for the lowest possible cost. The 2,500 MB/s reads are a genuine upgrade from SATA, and the single-sided PCB fits in virtually any M.2 slot. Skip it if you need more than a boot-drive's worth of storage, if documented endurance matters to you, or if a competitor like the WD Blue SN550 250 GB is available at a similar price with a 5-year warranty and published specifications. The P30's undocumented internals and 3-year warranty make it a harder sell the closer it gets to established alternatives in price. For a throwaway boot disk in a budget refurbish or an office PC that will never see heavy writes, the P30 240 GB works — and at this end of the market, working is enough.

+ Pros

2,500 MB/s reads, a clear upgrade from SATA III
Single-sided M.2 2280 PCB fits thin laptops
Lowest-cost entry into NVMe for older PCIe 3.0 systems
3-year warranty with standard RMA process
Identical rated read speed to the 480 GB variant

- Cons

NAND type and controller not publicly documented
240 GB capacity leaves little room beyond OS and essentials
Endurance rating unverified and likely incorrect
Write speed modest at 1,350 MB/s for PCIe 3.0
3-year warranty shorter than most competitors' 5-year coverage

🛒 Buy this or similar SSD Storage:

Samsung 980 Pro 2 Tb

-57% $165
List Price: $379.99

Buy on Amazon

INLAND Performance Plus 1 Tb

$79.99

Buy on Amazon

Silicon Power 512GB NVMe SSD

$42.97

Buy on Amazon

✨ Video Review

BUILD LOG: Angelo Farrales | PASIG CITY | InWin A1 Tempered Glass Mini ITX

⁉️ FAQ

Not really. The P30 240 GB is too small for a gaming drive — a single modern AAA title can consume 100 GB or more, and with roughly 223 GB of formatted capacity, you would struggle to fit the operating system and even one large game. The 2,500 MB/s read speed is fine for game load times, but the capacity is the limiting factor. If you want a Team Group drive for gaming, consider the MP33 or MP34 series at 512 GB or 1 TB. The P30 240 GB can serve as a boot drive alongside a larger game-storage SSD in a two-drive setup, but it should not be the primary game library disk.

No. The PS5 requires a PCIe 4.0 x4 NVMe drive with at least 5,500 MB/s sequential reads and a minimum capacity of 250 GB. The P30 fails on all three counts: it is PCIe 3.0, rated at 2,500 MB/s, and is available in 240 GB. The drive will be rejected by the PS5 expansion slot. Buyers looking for a PS5-compatible SSD should consider PCIe 4.0 drives like the WD Black SN770, Samsung 980 PRO, or Team Group's own Cardea A440 series.

Team Group does not explicitly document the P30's DRAM configuration. Based on its performance profile — 2,500 MB/s reads, 180,000 IOPS random read — and its budget positioning, the drive most likely uses an HMB-based, DRAM-less controller. HMB (Host Memory Buffer) borrows a small allocation of system RAM for the drive's mapping table, which is sufficient for consumer boot-drive workloads. The absence of a dedicated DRAM chip adds microseconds of latency under heavy multitasking but keeps the bill of materials low. Without a manufacturer disclosure or independent teardown, the exact configuration should be considered unconfirmed.

On paper, Team Group rates both the 240 GB and 480 GB P30 variants at the same 2,500 MB/s read and 1,350 MB/s write speeds. In practice, the 240 GB model will likely have lower sustained write performance due to having fewer NAND dies to parallelize writes across — a characteristic shared by all small-capacity SSDs. The SLC write cache is also expected to be smaller on the 240 GB variant, meaning it will exhaust sooner under sustained writes. For the boot-drive workloads the P30 is designed for, these differences are unlikely to be noticeable. For mixed-use scenarios with larger file transfers, the 480 GB variant is the stronger performer.

The P30 240 GB carries a 3-year limited warranty from Team Group. The endurance figure listed in third-party databases is 380 TBW — a number that, if accurate, would be unusually high for a 240 GB-class SSD and is likely a data-entry artefact at the source level. More typical endurance for a budget 250 GB SSD is 80 to 150 TBW. Without manufacturer-published specifications to corroborate the 380 TBW figure, it should not be relied upon for purchase decisions. Buyers who require a verified endurance rating should consider alternatives with documented specifications, such as the WD Blue SN550 250 GB (150 TBW) or Crucial P2 250 GB.

Technically yes, but it is tight. Windows 11 requires 64 GB of storage minimum, and the P30 provides roughly 223 GB of formatted capacity. After the operating system, reserved storage, and essential updates, you are left with approximately 150 GB for applications and files. This is workable for a basic productivity machine — web browser, office suite, email client — but leaves no room for large applications, media collections, or games. Users should budget for offloading media and infrequently used files to secondary storage. A 500 GB-class drive is a far more comfortable minimum for a single-drive Windows 11 system.

No. As a modest PCIe 3.0 drive with low power draw, the P30 does not require a dedicated heatsink under normal use. It generates significantly less heat than PCIe 4.0 or DRAM-equipped drives. Most desktop motherboards include an M.2 thermal solution that provides adequate cooling. In laptops without dedicated SSD cooling, the drive's thermal output is low enough that throttling is unlikely during typical boot-drive workloads. The P30 does not include a heatsink in the box, which is standard for entry-level M.2 SSDs.