HP FX700 4TB: fast QLC storage at bulk capacity (2026)

Posted on by Raymond Chen

Quick answer

The HP FX700 4TB suits content creators, media archivists, and gamers with large libraries who want bulk capacity at genuinely fast rated speeds without paying TLC-drive prices.

Read: 7200 MB/s Write: 6200 MB/s Endurance: 1600 TBW Warranty: 5 years Interface: M.2 4.0 x 4

The HP FX700 4TB combines the QLC line's full rated speed with the largest capacity and a 1,600 TBW endurance rating, all under a genuine 5-year warranty.

HP FX700 4TB: fast QLC storage at bulk capacity

Controller & Memory

HP pairs a Maxio MAP1602A-F3C four-channel controller with YMTC's 232-layer QLC NAND on the FX700, skipping a dedicated DRAM chip but including a 0.5mm graphene thermal pad in the box. It connects over PCIe 4.0 x4 with NVMe 2.0 in a single-sided M.2 2280 form factor, and HP's own materials pitch it toward content creators as well as gamers at this larger capacity.

At 4 TB, the FX700 hits the same 7,200/6,200 MB/s sequential ratings as the 1TB and 2TB models - only the 512GB capacity runs slower - while endurance scales all the way up to 1,600 TBW, the top of a properly-scaling curve that starts at 200 TBW on the 512GB model. This is the same drive family TweakTown specifically praised as the fastest QLC SSD it had tested, at its largest available capacity.

Its single-sided PCB and included thermal pad make the FX700 4TB a strong fit for laptops and the PS5, which HP explicitly markets it for as external expansion storage. At this capacity it competes with other high-capacity budget-flagship drives like the Crucial P3 Plus 4TB and Samsung 990 EVO Plus 4TB, both of which are more widely stocked at major Western retailers but don't clearly beat it on endurance.

FX700 Performance & Benchmarks

HP rates the FX700 4TB at up to 7,200 MB/s sequential reads and 6,200 MB/s sequential writes over PCIe 4.0 x4, matching the 1TB and 2TB capacities. The official datasheet lists random performance at 1,000,000 read IOPS and 820,000 write IOPS - the highest write-IOPS figure anywhere in the FX700 line, consistent with more NAND dies operating in parallel at this capacity.

Performance comparison

HP FX700 4 TB vs M.2 4.0 x 4 peers

Switch between sequential throughput and random IOPS to see how this drive stacks up against other M.2 4.0 x 4 SSDs in our database. The highlighted bar is the drive on this page — click any other bar to open that drive.

  • Patriot Viper PV593 1 TB: 14,500 MB/s read, 14,000 MB/s write
  • Patriot Viper PV593 2 TB: 14,500 MB/s read, 14,000 MB/s write
  • Patriot Viper PV593 4 TB: 14,500 MB/s read, 14,000 MB/s write
  • Patriot Viper PV573 2 TB: 14,000 MB/s read, 12,000 MB/s write
  • HP FX700 4 TB (this drive): 7,200 MB/s read, 6,200 MB/s write

QLC NAND is typically the weak point in a drive's sustained write performance, since it leans harder on its SLC write cache than TLC does. At 4 TB the FX700 has the largest absolute cache headroom in the line, so it takes a bigger sustained transfer to exhaust it before write speeds drop toward the native QLC ceiling. For large game libraries, media archives, and content-creation workflows that mix big files with everyday responsiveness, the FX700 4TB is one of the stronger QLC options available at this capacity, according to independent reviewers.

HP FX700 vs Competitors

See how the FX700 stacks up against other M.2 4.0 x 4 drives in our database:

Endurance, TBW & Warranty

HP rates the FX700 4TB at 1,600 TBW of total write endurance, backed by a 5-year limited warranty according to the official specification sheet. At a typical 20-50 GB of writes per day, that endurance budget lasts roughly 88 to 219 years before hitting the rated limit, far beyond any realistic ownership period, so endurance is effectively a non-issue at this capacity despite QLC's lower per-cell durability than TLC. The MTBF rating is 2,000,000 hours, a statistical reliability figure describing failure rates across a large population of drives rather than a promise for any individual unit.

The 5-year warranty term matches the rest of the FX700 line and is a genuine strength for a high-capacity QLC drive, especially paired with the 4TB model's properly-scaled endurance rating.

HP FX700 4 TB Specifications

Category Value
Capacity [?] 4 TB
Interface [?] M.2 4.0 x 4
Controller [?] Maxio MAP1602A-F3C 4 Channel
Memory type [?] YMTC 232-L QLC
DRAM [?] No
Read speed (MB/s) [?] 7200
Write speed (MB/s) [?] 6200
Read IOPS [?] 1000000
Write IOPS [?] 820000
Endurance (TBW) [?] 1600
MTBF (million hours) [?] 2000000
Warranty (years) [?] 5

Verdict: Is the FX700 Worth It in 2026?

The HP FX700 4TB suits content creators, media archivists, and gamers with large libraries who want bulk capacity at genuinely fast rated speeds without paying TLC-drive prices. It's a weaker choice for professionals doing constant large sustained writes at the highest end, where a TLC-based rival like the Samsung 990 EVO Plus holds sequential write speed more consistently past its own cache limit. Buyers who want a more widely available alternative at a similar QLC price point should consider the Crucial P3 Plus 4TB. Overall, the FX700 4TB carries the line's fastest-QLC reputation forward with genuinely scaled endurance and a strong warranty to match.

+ Pros

  • 7,200 MB/s sequential reads on PCIe 4.0
  • 1,600 TBW endurance, the highest in the FX700 line
  • 820,000 write IOPS, the fastest write-IOPS in the line
  • 5-year manufacturer warranty
  • Single-sided design with included graphene thermal pad

- Cons

  • QLC NAND has lower per-cell endurance than TLC
  • DRAM-less design relies on Host Memory Buffer
  • Highest power draw in the FX700 line at this capacity
  • Sustained writes past the SLC cache trail TLC rivals

3.8 / 5 · 41 votes

Buy this or similar SSD Storage:

Samsung 980 Pro 2 TB

-57% $165
List Price: $379.99

Buy on Amazon

Video Review

Обзор PCIe 4.0 SSD HP FX900 Pro 1TB (4A3U0AA#AAB)

Frequently Asked Questions

Yes - it shares the FX700 line's strong random IOPS performance, the same lineup TweakTown called the fastest QLC it had tested, and 4 TB is enough for a very large modern game library. Normal gaming use rarely pushes past its SLC write cache, making it a strong pick for a primary gaming and storage drive combined.

Yes - HP explicitly markets the FX700 for PS5 use, and its 7,200 MB/s rated sequential read comfortably clears Sony's suggested 5,500 MB/s minimum for expansion storage. Its single-sided M.2 2280 form factor with an included thermal pad fits the console's internal slot without clearance issues, and 4 TB is more capacity than most PS5 owners will need.

No, the FX700 is a DRAM-less design that relies on Host Memory Buffer and an SLC write cache instead of a dedicated DRAM chip. At 4 TB the cache has the most absolute headroom in the line, and independent testing found the drive delivers unusually strong random IOPS for a QLC-based design.

HP rates the 4TB FX700 at 1,600 TBW (terabytes written), the highest in the line, backed by a 5-year limited warranty. At a typical 20-50 GB of writes per day, that endurance budget lasts roughly 88 to 219 years before reaching the rated limit, making endurance essentially a non-issue at this capacity.

HP already includes a 0.5mm graphene thermal pad on the drive itself, which is enough for laptops, the PS5, and typical desktop use. Given this capacity's higher power draw under sustained load, desktop users running heavy write workloads may see a more noticeable benefit from an additional motherboard M.2 heatsink than on smaller FX700 capacities.

Both are DRAM-less, QLC-based PCIe 4.0 drives at bulk capacity, but the FX700 rates higher for sequential reads and random IOPS, and comes from the line TweakTown specifically called the fastest QLC it had tested. The Crucial P3 Plus has wider availability at major Western retailers and a longer independent track record, while the FX700's endurance rating and 5-year warranty are at least as strong.

Yes for mainstream use - the FX700 4TB's 1,600 TBW rating and 5-year warranty are both properly scaled for the capacity, and at a realistic 20-50 GB of daily writes the endurance budget lasts far longer than most people keep a drive. QLC's main trade-off is sustained write consistency during very large transfers, not long-term reliability under normal use.

Comments

  • Be the first to comment.

Comments are reviewed before they appear.