HP FX700 1TB: a genuinely fast budget QLC NVMe SSD (2026)

Posted on by Raymond Chen

Quick answer

The HP FX700 1TB suits gamers and PS5 owners who want genuinely fast rated speeds and strong warranty backing without paying TLC-drive prices.

Read: 7200 MB/s Write: 6200 MB/s Endurance: 400 TBW Warranty: 5 years Interface: M.2 4.0 x 4

The HP FX700 1TB is a DRAM-less PCIe 4.0 NVMe drive that TweakTown called the fastest QLC SSD it had tested, backed by a genuine 5-year warranty.

HP FX700 1TB: a genuinely fast budget QLC NVMe SSD

Controller & Memory

HP pairs a Maxio MAP1602A-F3C four-channel controller with YMTC's 232-layer QLC NAND on the FX700, skipping a dedicated DRAM chip but including a 0.5mm graphene thermal pad in the box - an unusual inclusion at this price point. It connects over PCIe 4.0 x4 with NVMe 2.0 in a single-sided M.2 2280 form factor, and HP's own materials pitch it toward both everyday gaming and lighter content-creation workflows.

The FX700 also ships in 512 GB, 2 TB, and 4 TB capacities, and unlike some budget rivals that keep endurance flat across the range, HP's official datasheet shows TBW scaling properly with capacity: 200 TBW at 512 GB up to 1,600 TBW at 4 TB, all under the same 5-year warranty. HP's storage products, including the FX700, are manufactured by Biwin as an ODM partner rather than in-house.

Its single-sided PCB and included thermal pad make the FX700 a strong fit for laptops and the PS5, which HP explicitly markets it for as external expansion storage. At this speed and price it competes with other fast QLC and aggressive-cache budget-flagship drives like the Crucial P3 Plus and Samsung 990 EVO Plus, both of which are more widely stocked at major Western retailers and easier for cautious buyers to find locally.

FX700 Performance & Benchmarks

HP rates the FX700 1TB at up to 7,200 MB/s sequential reads and 6,200 MB/s sequential writes over PCIe 4.0 x4, and the official datasheet lists random performance at 1,040,000 read IOPS and 809,000 write IOPS - unusually strong figures for a QLC-based drive. That combination is what earned it TweakTown's 'fastest QLC ever tested' verdict in its review of the 2 TB model, and independent testing from TechPowerUp and others found similarly strong results.

Performance comparison

HP FX700 1 TB vs M.2 4.0 x 4 peers

Switch between sequential throughput and random IOPS to see how this drive stacks up against other M.2 4.0 x 4 SSDs in our database. The highlighted bar is the drive on this page — click any other bar to open that drive.

  • Patriot Viper PV593 1 TB: 14,500 MB/s read, 14,000 MB/s write
  • Patriot Viper PV593 2 TB: 14,500 MB/s read, 14,000 MB/s write
  • Patriot Viper PV593 4 TB: 14,500 MB/s read, 14,000 MB/s write
  • Patriot Viper PV573 2 TB: 14,000 MB/s read, 12,000 MB/s write
  • HP FX700 1 TB (this drive): 7,200 MB/s read, 6,200 MB/s write

QLC NAND is typically the weak point in a drive's sustained write performance, since it has fewer voltage states of margin than TLC and leans harder on its SLC write cache. Once a large sustained transfer exhausts that cache, write speeds on the FX700 drop more noticeably than they would on a TLC-based rival. For gaming, everyday multitasking, and moderate file transfers - the workloads most buyers actually run - the FX700 delivers speeds that outrun many TLC drives in the same price range, backed by genuinely low power draw that benefits laptop battery life.

HP FX700 vs Competitors

See how the FX700 stacks up against other M.2 4.0 x 4 drives in our database:

Endurance, TBW & Warranty

HP rates the FX700 1TB at 400 TBW of total write endurance, backed by a 5-year limited warranty according to the official specification sheet. At a typical 20-50 GB of writes per day, that endurance budget lasts roughly 22 to 55 years before hitting the rated limit, comfortably beyond the drive's realistic service life, so endurance is not a practical concern for mainstream use despite QLC's lower per-cell durability than TLC. The MTBF rating is 2,000,000 hours, a statistical reliability figure describing failure rates across a large population of drives rather than a promise for any individual unit.

The 5-year warranty term is a genuine strength for a QLC drive at this price, matching or beating several TLC-based competitors and reflecting HP's standard consumer-storage support terms.

HP FX700 1 TB Specifications

Category Value
Capacity [?] 1 TB
Interface [?] M.2 4.0 x 4
Controller [?] Maxio MAP1602A-F3C 4 Channel
Memory type [?] YMTC 232-L QLC
DRAM [?] No
Read speed (MB/s) [?] 7200
Write speed (MB/s) [?] 6200
Read IOPS [?] 1040000
Write IOPS [?] 809000
Endurance (TBW) [?] 400
MTBF (million hours) [?] 2000000
Warranty (years) [?] 5

Verdict: Is the FX700 Worth It in 2026?

The HP FX700 1TB suits gamers and PS5 owners who want genuinely fast rated speeds and strong warranty backing without paying TLC-drive prices. It's a weaker choice for professionals doing constant large sustained writes, where QLC's smaller effective cache margin shows up sooner than on a TLC-based rival like the Samsung 990 EVO Plus. Buyers who want a more widely available alternative at a similar QLC price point should consider the Crucial P3 Plus. Overall, independent reviewers rated the FX700 line as genuinely fast for QLC, and the 1TB capacity carries that reputation forward at a competitive price.

+ Pros

  • 7,200 MB/s sequential reads on PCIe 4.0
  • 1,040,000 read IOPS, unusually fast for QLC
  • 5-year manufacturer warranty
  • Single-sided design with included graphene thermal pad
  • TBW scales properly with capacity across the lineup

- Cons

  • QLC NAND has lower per-cell endurance than TLC
  • DRAM-less design relies on Host Memory Buffer
  • Manufactured by Biwin as an HP-branded ODM product
  • Sustained writes past the SLC cache trail TLC rivals

4.5 / 5 · 115 votes

Buy this or similar SSD Storage:

Samsung 980 Pro 2 TB

-57% $165
List Price: $379.99

Buy on Amazon

Video Review

Обзор PCIe 4.0 SSD HP FX900 Pro 1TB (4A3U0AA#AAB)

Frequently Asked Questions

Yes - TweakTown called the FX700 line the fastest QLC SSD it had tested, and its 1,040,000 read IOPS rating outperforms many TLC drives for everyday responsiveness and game load times. Normal gaming use rarely pushes past its SLC write cache, making it a strong pick for a primary gaming drive despite using QLC NAND.

Yes - HP explicitly markets the FX700 for PS5 use, and its 7,200 MB/s rated sequential read comfortably clears Sony's suggested 5,500 MB/s minimum for expansion storage. Its single-sided M.2 2280 form factor with an included thin thermal pad fits the console's internal slot without clearance issues, so no separate heatsink purchase is needed.

No, the FX700 is a DRAM-less design that relies on Host Memory Buffer and an SLC write cache instead of a dedicated DRAM chip. Despite the missing DRAM and using QLC NAND, independent testing found it delivers unusually strong random IOPS for its class, well ahead of most other DRAM-less QLC drives.

HP rates the 1TB FX700 at 400 TBW (terabytes written) backed by a 5-year limited warranty. At a typical 20-50 GB of writes per day, that endurance budget lasts roughly 22 to 55 years before reaching the rated limit, comfortably beyond most ownership periods despite QLC NAND's lower endurance-per-cell than TLC.

HP already includes a 0.5mm graphene thermal pad on the drive itself, which is enough for laptops, the PS5, and typical desktop use. Desktop users running sustained heavy write workloads may still see a small benefit from an additional motherboard M.2 heatsink, but it isn't required for normal day-to-day operation.

Both are DRAM-less, QLC-based PCIe 4.0 drives, but the FX700 rates higher on paper for sequential reads and random IOPS, and independent reviewers specifically praised its speed for a QLC drive. The Crucial P3 Plus has wider availability at major Western retailers and a longer independent track record, while the FX700's 5-year warranty matches or beats it.

For most mainstream use - gaming, everyday computing, moderate file transfers - yes, especially on a drive like the FX700 that independent reviewers rated as unusually fast for QLC. It's a weaker fit for professionals doing constant large sustained writes, such as video editing scratch disks, where TLC-based drives hold their write speed more consistently once the SLC cache empties.

Comments

  • Be the first to comment.

Comments are reviewed before they appear.