HP FX700 2TB: TweakTown's fastest QLC drive tested (2026)

Posted on by Raymond Chen

Quick answer

The HP FX700 2TB suits gamers and content hoarders who want genuinely fast rated speeds, real capacity, and strong warranty backing without paying TLC-drive prices - and it's the exact capacity independent reviewers singled out as the fastest QLC they'd tested.

Read: 7200 MB/s Write: 6200 MB/s Endurance: 800 TBW Warranty: 5 years Interface: M.2 4.0 x 4

The HP FX700 2TB is the capacity TweakTown specifically reviewed and called the fastest QLC SSD it had tested, backed by a genuine 5-year warranty.

HP FX700 2TB: TweakTown's fastest QLC drive tested

Controller & Memory

HP pairs a Maxio MAP1602A-F3C four-channel controller with YMTC's 232-layer QLC NAND on the FX700, skipping a dedicated DRAM chip but including a 0.5mm graphene thermal pad in the box. It connects over PCIe 4.0 x4 with NVMe 2.0 in a single-sided M.2 2280 form factor, and HP's own materials pitch it toward both gaming and lighter content-creation workflows.

At 2 TB, the FX700 hits the same 7,200/6,200 MB/s sequential ratings as the 1TB and 4TB models - only the 512GB capacity runs slower - while endurance scales up to 800 TBW, double the 1TB model's 400 TBW, under the same 5-year warranty. This is also the exact capacity TweakTown tested for its 'fastest QLC ever tested' review, so its reputation for the line is grounded in this specific SKU rather than borrowed from a different capacity's numbers.

Its single-sided PCB and included thermal pad make the FX700 2TB a strong fit for laptops and the PS5, which HP explicitly markets it for as external expansion storage. At this capacity it competes with other fast QLC and aggressive-cache drives like the Crucial P3 Plus 2TB and Samsung 990 EVO Plus 2TB, both of which are more widely stocked at major Western retailers but don't clearly beat its review reputation.

FX700 Performance & Benchmarks

HP rates the FX700 2TB at up to 7,200 MB/s sequential reads and 6,200 MB/s sequential writes over PCIe 4.0 x4, and the official datasheet lists random performance at 1,050,000 read IOPS and 721,000 write IOPS. That read-IOPS figure is the highest in the whole FX700 line and is what anchored TweakTown's 'fastest QLC ever tested' verdict for this specific capacity.

Performance comparison

HP FX700 2 TB vs M.2 4.0 x 4 peers

Switch between sequential throughput and random IOPS to see how this drive stacks up against other M.2 4.0 x 4 SSDs in our database. The highlighted bar is the drive on this page — click any other bar to open that drive.

  • Patriot Viper PV593 1 TB: 14,500 MB/s read, 14,000 MB/s write
  • Patriot Viper PV593 2 TB: 14,500 MB/s read, 14,000 MB/s write
  • Patriot Viper PV593 4 TB: 14,500 MB/s read, 14,000 MB/s write
  • Patriot Viper PV573 2 TB: 14,000 MB/s read, 12,000 MB/s write
  • HP FX700 2 TB (this drive): 7,200 MB/s read, 6,200 MB/s write

QLC NAND is typically the weak point in a drive's sustained write performance, since it leans harder on its SLC write cache than TLC does. Once a large sustained transfer exhausts that cache on the 2TB FX700, write speeds drop more noticeably than they would on a TLC-based rival, though the larger capacity gives the cache more absolute headroom before that happens. For gaming, content libraries, and moderate file transfers, the FX700 2TB delivers speeds that outrun many TLC drives in the same price range, with power draw low enough to suit laptop use as well as desktops.

HP FX700 vs Competitors

See how the FX700 stacks up against other M.2 4.0 x 4 drives in our database:

Endurance, TBW & Warranty

HP rates the FX700 2TB at 800 TBW of total write endurance, backed by a 5-year limited warranty according to the official specification sheet. At a typical 20-50 GB of writes per day, that endurance budget lasts roughly 44 to 110 years before hitting the rated limit, far beyond the drive's realistic service life, so endurance is not a practical concern despite QLC's lower per-cell durability than TLC. The MTBF rating is 2,000,000 hours, a statistical reliability figure describing failure rates across a large population of drives rather than a promise for any individual unit.

The 5-year warranty term is a genuine strength for a QLC drive at this price and capacity, matching or beating several TLC-based competitors.

HP FX700 2 TB Specifications

Category Value
Capacity [?] 2 TB
Interface [?] M.2 4.0 x 4
Controller [?] Maxio MAP1602A-F3C 4 Channel
Memory type [?] YMTC 232-L QLC
DRAM [?] No
Read speed (MB/s) [?] 7200
Write speed (MB/s) [?] 6200
Read IOPS [?] 1050000
Write IOPS [?] 721000
Endurance (TBW) [?] 800
MTBF (million hours) [?] 2000000
Warranty (years) [?] 5

Verdict: Is the FX700 Worth It in 2026?

The HP FX700 2TB suits gamers and content hoarders who want genuinely fast rated speeds, real capacity, and strong warranty backing without paying TLC-drive prices - and it's the exact capacity independent reviewers singled out as the fastest QLC they'd tested. It's a weaker choice for professionals doing constant large sustained writes, where QLC's smaller effective cache margin shows up sooner than on a TLC-based rival like the Samsung 990 EVO Plus. Buyers who want a more widely available alternative at a similar QLC price point should consider the Crucial P3 Plus 2TB. Overall, the FX700 2TB backs up its strong review reputation with genuinely solid specs.

+ Pros

  • 7,200 MB/s sequential reads on PCIe 4.0
  • 1,050,000 read IOPS, the fastest in the FX700 line
  • 800 TBW endurance backed by a 5-year warranty
  • Single-sided design with included graphene thermal pad
  • Reviewed as the fastest QLC SSD TweakTown had tested

- Cons

  • QLC NAND has lower per-cell endurance than TLC
  • DRAM-less design relies on Host Memory Buffer
  • Manufactured by Biwin as an HP-branded ODM product
  • Sustained writes past the SLC cache trail TLC rivals

4 / 5 · 106 votes

Buy this or similar SSD Storage:

Samsung 980 Pro 2 TB

-57% $165
List Price: $379.99

Buy on Amazon

Video Review

Обзор PCIe 4.0 SSD HP FX900 Pro 1TB (4A3U0AA#AAB)

Frequently Asked Questions

Yes - TweakTown specifically tested this 2TB capacity and called it the fastest QLC SSD it had reviewed, with 1,050,000 read IOPS outperforming many TLC drives for load times and responsiveness. 2 TB is also enough room for a large modern game library, making it a strong price-to-performance pick for gaming despite using QLC NAND.

Yes - HP explicitly markets the FX700 for PS5 use, and its 7,200 MB/s rated sequential read comfortably clears Sony's suggested 5,500 MB/s minimum for expansion storage. Its single-sided M.2 2280 form factor with an included thermal pad fits the console's internal slot without clearance issues, and 2 TB is a practical capacity for a PS5 library upgrade.

No, the FX700 is a DRAM-less design that relies on Host Memory Buffer and an SLC write cache instead of a dedicated DRAM chip. At 2 TB the cache has more absolute headroom than on smaller FX700 capacities, and independent testing still found it delivers unusually strong random IOPS for a QLC drive.

HP rates the 2TB FX700 at 800 TBW (terabytes written) backed by a 5-year limited warranty. At a typical 20-50 GB of writes per day, that endurance budget lasts roughly 44 to 110 years before reaching the rated limit, far beyond most ownership periods despite QLC NAND's lower endurance-per-cell than TLC.

HP already includes a 0.5mm graphene thermal pad on the drive itself, which is enough for laptops, the PS5, and typical desktop use. Desktop users running sustained heavy write workloads may still see a small benefit from an additional motherboard M.2 heatsink, but it isn't required for normal day-to-day operation.

Both are DRAM-less, QLC-based PCIe 4.0 drives, but the FX700 rates higher for sequential reads and random IOPS, and was specifically singled out by TweakTown as the fastest QLC drive it had tested. The Crucial P3 Plus has wider availability at major Western retailers and a longer independent track record, while the FX700's 5-year warranty matches or beats it.

For most mainstream use - gaming, content libraries, everyday computing - yes, especially on a drive independent reviewers rated as the fastest QLC they'd tested. It's a weaker fit for professionals doing constant large sustained writes, such as video editing scratch disks, where TLC-based drives hold their write speed more consistently once the SLC cache empties.

Comments

  • Be the first to comment.

Comments are reviewed before they appear.