Samsung 970 EVO 250GB NVMe SSD Review (2026)

Posted on May 23, 2026 by Raymond Chen

The Samsung 970 EVO 250GB was Samsung's mainstream PCIe 3.0 NVMe entry point before the EVO Plus refresh, pairing 64-layer TLC V-NAND with a Phoenix controller at a budget-friendly capacity.

Samsung 970 EVO 250GB NVMe SSD Review

Controller & Memory

Under the label, the 250 GB 970 EVO uses Samsung's Phoenix controller with 512 MB of LPDDR4 DRAM and 64-layer (V4) 3D TLC V-NAND. This is the previous generation of NAND compared to the 92-layer V5 flash in the 970 EVO Plus. The 250 GB model is the slowest in the family, rated at 3,500 MB/s sequential reads but only 1,500 MB/s sequential writes, compared to 2,300 MB/s on the 970 EVO Plus 250GB.

Random performance peaks at 500,000 read IOPS and 450,000 write IOPS. The TurboWrite SLC cache is 4 GB fixed plus up to 9 GB Intelligent, small enough that sustained transfers hit TLC-native speeds quickly. Endurance is 150 TBW with a five-year warranty.

As a boot drive or OS install target the 970 EVO 250GB is adequate, but it has been superseded by the 970 EVO Plus which offers higher writes and updated NAND at a similar price point. The single-sided M.2 2280 form factor fits laptops and desktops. Direct competitors include the WD Blue SN500 and the Crucial MX500 M.2, though the latter uses SATA.

970 EVO Performance & Benchmarks

The 250 GB 970 EVO is rated for 3,500 MB/s sequential reads and 1,500 MB/s sequential writes, the lowest write speed in the 970 EVO family. Random performance reaches up to 500,000 read IOPS and 450,000 write IOPS. The TurboWrite cache is 4 GB fixed plus up to 9 GB Intelligent TurboWrite, and once it fills, direct-to-TLC writes drop to roughly 300 MB/s.

Performance comparison

Samsung 970 EVO 250 GB vs M.2 3.0 x 4 peers

Switch between sequential throughput and random IOPS to see how this drive stacks up against other M.2 3.0 x 4 SSDs in our database. The highlighted bar is the drive on this page — click any other bar to open that drive.

  • Samsung 970 EVO 250 GB (this drive): 3,500 MB/s read, 1,500 MB/s write
  • ADATA SX 8800 Pro 512 GB: 3,500 MB/s read, 2,700 MB/s write
  • ADATA SX 8800 Pro 1 TB: 3,500 MB/s read, 2,700 MB/s write
  • ADATA XPG Spectrix S40G RGB 256 GB: 3,500 MB/s read, 3,000 MB/s write
  • ADATA XPG Spectrix S40G RGB 512 GB: 3,500 MB/s read, 3,000 MB/s write

For everyday desktop use as a boot drive, the 1,500 MB/s write ceiling rarely matters since most OS-level writes are small and random. Game loads benefit from the full 3,500 MB/s read speed. Independent reviewers found the 970 EVO 250GB competitive with other PCIe 3.0 drives at its capacity tier when it launched, but the 970 EVO Plus significantly outperforms it in write-heavy workloads.

Samsung 970 EVO vs Competitors

See how the 970 EVO stacks up against other M.2 3.0 x 4 drives in our database:

Endurance, TBW & Warranty

Samsung covers the 970 EVO 250GB with a five-year limited warranty terminated at 150 TBW. At a typical consumer write workload of 20 GB per day, 150 TBW translates to over 20 years of use, making endurance a non-concern for a boot drive. Samsung's Magician software tracks TBW consumption and drive health in real time.

Samsung 970 EVO 250 GB Specifications

Category Value
Capacity [?] 250 GB
Interface [?] M.2 3.0 x 4
Controller [?] Samsung Phoenix
Memory type [?] Samsung TLC
DRAM [?] 512MB LPDDR4
Read speed (MB/s) [?] 3500
Write speed (MB/s) [?] 1500
Read IOPS [?] 500000
Write IOPS [?] 450000
Endurance (TBW) [?] 150
MTBF (million hours) [?] 1.5
Warranty (years) [?] 5

Verdict: Is the 970 EVO Worth It in 2026?

The Samsung 970 EVO 250GB was a solid mainstream PCIe 3.0 NVMe SSD at launch, but the 970 EVO Plus 250GB offers higher writes (2,300 vs 1,500 MB/s), updated NAND, and a larger TurboWrite cache at a similar price. Buyers choosing between the two should pick the EVO Plus unless the original EVO is significantly discounted. The WD Blue SN570 250GB is a worthy alternative at this capacity tier.

+ Pros

  • 3,500 MB/s sequential reads saturate PCIe 3.0
  • Samsung Phoenix controller with LPDDR4 DRAM
  • Single-sided M.2 2280 fits laptops
  • 150 TBW endurance with five-year warranty

- Cons

  • Only 1,500 MB/s sequential writes
  • Superseded by the faster 970 EVO Plus
  • Small 4 GB base TurboWrite cache
  • TLC write speed drops to ~300 MB/s after cache

3.1 / 5 · 53 votes

Buy this or similar SSD Storage:

Samsung 980 Pro 2 TB

-57% $165
List Price: $379.99

Buy on Amazon

Video Review

Samsung 970 EVO NVMe M.2 SSD Review

Frequently Asked Questions

The 970 EVO 250GB handles gaming well as a boot drive with its 3,500 MB/s read speed. Game load times are competitive with any PCIe 3.0 NVMe drive. The 250 GB capacity limits how many games you can install alongside the OS, and the 1,500 MB/s write speed means game installations take longer than on faster drives.

The 970 EVO uses 64-layer TLC V-NAND while the EVO Plus uses 92-layer TLC V-NAND with firmware optimizations. At 250 GB, the EVO writes at 1,500 MB/s versus 2,300 MB/s on the Plus. The Plus also has larger Intelligent TurboWrite caches and higher random read IOPS at most capacities. Both use the same Phoenix controller and DRAM.

No, the PS5 requires a PCIe 4.0 NVMe M.2 SSD with recommended reads of 5,500 MB/s or higher and a heatsink. The 970 EVO uses PCIe 3.0 and maxes out at 3,500 MB/s reads, which does not meet Sony's published requirements.

The 250 GB model is rated at 150 TBW (terabytes written) under Samsung's five-year warranty. At a typical consumer write rate of 20 GB per day, this translates to approximately 20 years of use before reaching the endurance ceiling.

Yes, the 970 EVO uses Samsung LPDDR4 DRAM for its flash translation layer. The 250 GB model has 512 MB, the 500 GB has 512 MB, the 1 TB has 1 GB, and the 2 TB has 2 GB. This DRAM is separate from the TurboWrite SLC cache used for write buffering.

Comments

  • Be the first to comment.

Comments are reviewed before they appear.