Silicon Power US75 4TB Review — Bulk Gen4 Storage, Bare and Simple (2026)

Posted on by Raymond Chen

Quick answer

Buy the Silicon Power US75 4TB when the goal is a large game library or archive volume with real Gen4 speed and no premium: 7,000/6,500 MB/s ratings, 2,400 TBW of endurance, TLC flash and a slim bare board that fits secondary slots with ease.

Read: 7000 MB/s Write: 6500 MB/s Endurance: 2400 TBW Warranty: 5 years Interface: M.2 4.0 x 4

The Silicon Power US75 4TB tops its line with 7,000/6,500 MB/s ratings and 2,400 TBW of endurance — bulk Gen4 storage on an 8-gram bare board.

Silicon Power US75 4TB Review — Bulk Gen4 Storage, Bare and Simple

Controller & Memory

The Silicon Power US75 4TB is the largest capacity of the line, running Maxio's MAP1602 four-channel controller DRAM-less with Host Memory Buffer and YMTC 232-layer 3D TLC behind it over PCIe 4.0 x4. Silicon Power's spec table rates it at 7,000 MB/s sequential reads and 6,500 MB/s writes — the full write rating, with reads stepping down 400 MB/s from the 7,400 MB/s that the 1 TB and 2 TB models carry. Endurance is the line's largest: 2,400 TBW under a 5-year warranty, confirmed by TechPowerUp and Wccftech's launch coverage.

At 4 TB the drive's job changes from boot disk to bulk storage: a complete Steam or console-side library, a photo and video archive, or a secondary project volume. The slim bare card — 22.0 x 80.0 x 3.6 mm, 8 grams, single-sided — suits secondary M.2 slots in towers and NAS-style builds, and Silicon Power's heatsink-equipped US75 SKU exists for slots without airflow. Tom's Hardware's testing of the 2 TB sibling found the platform runs efficiently and cool, and the 4 TB model spreads writes across more NAND packages, which helps both sustained throughput and per-package heat.

The competition at 4 TB splits into two camps: the Lexar NM790 4TB runs essentially the same MAP1602-plus-YMTC recipe, while the Crucial P3 Plus 4TB undercuts on price with QLC flash and its endurance rating shows it. The WD Black SN850X 4TB is the flagship alternative with DRAM and deeper review coverage. The US75's argument is TLC endurance and full write ratings at value-tier money.

US75 Performance & Benchmarks

Silicon Power rates the 4 TB US75 at 7,000 MB/s sequential reads and 6,500 MB/s writes, with no official IOPS figure published. Reads remain firmly in the top Gen4 band — the 400 MB/s reduction versus the 1 TB and 2 TB models is invisible in any real workload — while the 6,500 MB/s write rating matches the 2 TB model and moves a 100 GB game in well under two minutes of burst time. As a bulk volume, what matters is how the drive behaves when the SLC cache is gone, and here the 4 TB capacity is at its best: the pseudo-SLC cache spans a large data pool, so mixed workloads rarely exhaust it, and sustained transfers settle to a steady native TLC rate rather than collapsing.

Performance comparison

Silicon Power US75 4 TB vs M.2 4.0 x 4 peers

Switch between sequential throughput and random IOPS to see how this drive stacks up against other M.2 4.0 x 4 SSDs in our database. The highlighted bar is the drive on this page — click any other bar to open that drive.

  • Patriot Viper PV593 1 TB: 14,500 MB/s read, 14,000 MB/s write
  • Patriot Viper PV593 2 TB: 14,500 MB/s read, 14,000 MB/s write
  • Patriot Viper PV593 4 TB: 14,500 MB/s read, 14,000 MB/s write
  • Patriot Viper PV573 2 TB: 14,000 MB/s read, 12,000 MB/s write
  • Silicon Power US75 4 TB (this drive): 7,000 MB/s read, 6,500 MB/s write

The DRAM-less Host Memory Buffer architecture keeps translation tables in system RAM, and with 4 TB of flash the tables grow — reviewers of the smaller models found the platform's responsiveness solid, and the same firmware scales up. Thermals follow the family pattern: Tom's Hardware and FunkyKit both documented cool, efficient operation without a heatsink, and the 4 TB card's greater package count spreads the same heat further. In a tower with any airflow the bare card is self-sufficient; for a sealed or GPU-adjacent slot, the heatsink SKU adds margin. Independent benchmarks of this exact 4 TB variant remain scarce, so the manufacturer ratings stand as the reference.

Silicon Power US75 vs Competitors

See how the US75 stacks up against other M.2 4.0 x 4 drives in our database:

Endurance, TBW & Warranty

Silicon Power covers the US75 4TB with a 5-year limited warranty rated to 2,400 TBW, whichever arrives first — confirmed by TechPowerUp's database entry and Wccftech's coverage of the 4 TB launch. That endurance budget equals about 1.3 TB of writes every day across the full warranty term; even a heavy 200 GB-per-day archive workload would run more than 32 years against the rating, so the 5-year term is the practical limit. The MTBF is rated at 1.5 million hours per Silicon Power's spec sheet — a fleet-level statistic, not a promise for any individual card. Sibling capacities carry 300, 600 and 1,200 TBW. Claims go through Silicon Power's regional support network with proof of purchase, with retailers handling most first-line returns.

Silicon Power US75 4 TB Specifications

Category Value
Capacity [?] 4 TB
Interface [?] M.2 4.0 x 4
Controller [?] Maxio MAP1602
Memory type [?] YMTC 232-L TLC
DRAM [?] No
Read speed (MB/s) [?] 7000
Write speed (MB/s) [?] 6500
Read IOPS [?] n/a
Write IOPS [?] n/a
Endurance (TBW) [?] 2400
MTBF (million hours) [?] 1500000
Warranty (years) [?] 5

Verdict: Is the US75 Worth It in 2026?

Buy the Silicon Power US75 4TB when the goal is a large game library or archive volume with real Gen4 speed and no premium: 7,000/6,500 MB/s ratings, 2,400 TBW of endurance, TLC flash and a slim bare board that fits secondary slots with ease. Skip it for professional sustained-write duty — a DRAM-equipped drive such as the WD Black SN850X handles those better — and check the fine print if QLC pricing elsewhere looks tempting, because the endurance gap at 4 TB is enormous. Against the Lexar NM790 4TB it is essentially the same hardware; choose on price and availability. As bulk TLC storage, this is a competent, well-warrantied package.

+ Pros

  • 2,400 TBW endurance with 5-year warranty
  • Full 6,500 MB/s write rating at 4 TB
  • Large SLC cache headroom on a 4 TB population
  • Slim 8 g single-sided board fits secondary slots
  • YMTC 232-layer TLC, not QLC

- Cons

  • Reads rated below the 1 TB and 2 TB models
  • DRAM-less design on the standard card
  • No heatsink included on the standard card
  • NAND batches can vary between retail units

3.3 / 5 · 65 votes

Buy this or similar SSD Storage:

Samsung 980 Pro 2 TB

-57% $165
List Price: $379.99

Buy on Amazon

Video Review

🚀 Silicon Power US75 SSD Review | The BEST Gen4 NVME SSD for Under $100!

Frequently Asked Questions

Yes, and 4 TB is the capacity where a Gen4 drive stops being a boot disk and becomes the whole library. The 7,000 MB/s read rating stays in the top PCIe 4.0 band, so load times are indistinguishable from any flagship, and the 6,500 MB/s write rating installs 100 GB-plus titles quickly. The large SLC cache at this capacity keeps burst performance strong through long gaming-session downloads, and the platform runs cool without a heatsink per reviewers' testing of the family. For a PC that hosts dozens of games, or as a PS5-side volume with an added heatsink, it fits the role well.

It meets Sony's speed criteria — 7,000 MB/s rated reads clear the 5,500 MB/s recommendation comfortably, and the slim 22.0 x 80.0 x 3.6 mm board fits the console's physical limits — but the standard card ships without a heatsink, which Sony's setup expects. The fix is either an inexpensive aftermarket low-profile cooler or Silicon Power's heatsink-equipped US75 SKU. With cooling addressed, 4 TB is the dream-case console expansion: an entire PlayStation library with years of headroom, and the 2,400 TBW endurance budget dwarfs anything console gaming can generate.

The 4 TB model is rated at 2,400 TBW under a 5-year limited warranty, whichever arrives first — confirmed by TechPowerUp's database and Wccftech's launch coverage. That is the largest budget in the US75 line, double the 2 TB model's 1,200 TBW and eight times the 512 GB model's 300 TBW. In practical terms it allows about 1.3 TB of writes per day across five years; even a 200 GB-per-day workload would take over 32 years to exhaust. The TLC NAND behind the figure is the standout advantage over QLC-based 4 TB competitors, whose endurance budgets are typically far smaller.

No — the US75 line is DRAM-less across all capacities, including the 4 TB. The Maxio MAP1602 controller uses the NVMe Host Memory Buffer feature to keep flash translation tables in system RAM, and a pseudo-SLC cache carved from the YMTC 232-layer TLC absorbs burst writes. At 4 TB both mechanisms have unusually generous room: the cache spans a large data pool and everyday workloads rarely exhaust it. The DRAM-less design's fingerprints appear only in sustained transfers that outlast the cache, where throughput settles to native TLC rates, and in the value pricing the architecture enables.

The storage type is the whole argument. The P3 Plus uses QLC flash, so its 4 TB endurance budget and sustained-write behavior trail the US75's TLC-based 2,400 TBW rating substantially, and QLC performance degrades further as the drive fills. The US75 counters with 7,000/6,500 MB/s rated speeds, TLC endurance and a 5-year warranty, typically at a modest premium. Both are DRAM-less Gen4 drives that suit bulk storage duty. Choose the P3 Plus only when absolute lowest price per terabyte governs and writes will be rare; for any workload involving regular installs, transfers or editing, the US75's TLC is the safer long-term buy.

As a project and footage archive, yes — 4 TB holds a serious body of 4K material, the 6,500 MB/s write rating ingests camera cards faster than any SD or CFexpress reader can feed it, and the 2,400 TBW endurance budget shrugs off rewrite-heavy editing. As a live scratch disk for multi-camera 6K or 8K timelines, be more careful: the drive is DRAM-less, so cache-exhausting sustained writes settle to native TLC rates, and no independent benchmark of this exact 4 TB variant exists to verify its worst-case behavior. Creators with sustained workloads should look at DRAM-equipped flagships; everyone else gets a capable, well-warrantied volume.

Comments

  • Be the first to comment.

Comments are reviewed before they appear.