Transcend MTE250S 2TB Review: A Graphene-Thin Gen4 Contender (2026)

Posted on by Raymond Chen

Quick answer

Buy the Transcend MTE250S 2TB when a Gen4 system needs a slim, DRAM-equipped drive with an endurance budget most rivals don't match — thin laptops, small-form-factor builds and PS5 storage all fit.

Read: 7100 MB/s Write: 6500 MB/s Endurance: 1560 TBW Warranty: 5 years Interface: M.2 4.0 x 4

The Transcend MTE250S 2TB pairs 7,100 MB/s Gen4 reads with 1,560 TBW endurance and a graphene pad so thin it disappears into a laptop slot.

Transcend MTE250S 2TB Review: A Graphene-Thin Gen4 Contender

Controller & Memory

Under the graphene skin of the Transcend MTE250S 2TB sits a serious Gen4 platform: Silicon Motion's SM2264F eight-channel controller on a 12nm die, Kioxia BiCS5 112-layer TLC NAND and a dedicated 2GB DDR4-3200 DRAM cache — TechPowerUp's teardown confirms all three components. Transcend rates this capacity at 7,100 MB/s sequential reads and 6,500 MB/s writes, with 530K random-read and 420K random-write IOPS over PCIe 4.0 x4 and NVMe 1.4. The PCB is double-sided, yet the bonded graphene pad holds total thickness to 3.77 mm and weight to 10 grams — thin enough for slim laptop slots and console installs where a finned cooler would never fit.

The MTE250S is the thinner half of a two-drive family. Its sibling, the MTE250H, swaps graphene for a finned aluminum heatsink that adds height (9.2 mm) and heft but promises roughly 15 percent lower temperatures — the better pick for open desktop slots. Both share the same platform and the same capacity ladder: the 1TB model rates 7,200/6,200 MB/s with 780 TBW, this 2TB version trades 100 MB/s of read speed for 300 MB/s of extra write and doubles endurance to 1,560 TBW, and the 4TB tops the range at 7,500/6,700 MB/s with 3,120 TBW. Every capacity carries a five-year limited warranty.

The buyer profile is clear: anyone who wants DRAM-equipped Gen4 performance in a slot where a finned heatsink won't fit — thin laptops, small-form-factor builds, or a PS5 expansion slot where the graphene layer plus console airflow handles cooling. Against the DRAM-less WD Black SN770, the MTE250S counters with real DRAM and stronger write ratings; against Kingston's KC3000 it gives up rated speed but ships slimmer and still lands far above Gen3 drives. Samsung's 990 Pro remains the outright speed purchase, while Transcend bundles its SSD Scope toolkit for monitoring, diagnostics and cloning, and the endurance budget here is unusually generous for the class.

MTE250s Performance & Benchmarks

Transcend rates the 2TB MTE250S at 7,100 MB/s sequential reads and 6,500 MB/s writes, with 530K random-read and 420K random-write IOPS. ssd-tester.com's full bench of this exact model measured 7,066/6,490 MB/s in CrystalDiskMark's sequential test — effectively on spec — and its 150 GB HD Tune write pass averaged 1,802 MB/s across the whole surface, a strong sustained figure for the tier. The dynamic pseudo-SLC cache measured roughly 108 GB before throttling, after which steady-state writes settle around 1,800 MB/s, well above the several-hundred-MB/s floor typical of DRAM-less competitors.

Performance comparison

Transcend MTE250s 2 TB vs M.2 4.0 x 4 peers

Switch between sequential throughput and random IOPS to see how this drive stacks up against other M.2 4.0 x 4 SSDs in our database. The highlighted bar is the drive on this page — click any other bar to open that drive.

  • Patriot Viper PV593 1 TB: 14,500 MB/s read, 14,000 MB/s write
  • Patriot Viper PV593 2 TB: 14,500 MB/s read, 14,000 MB/s write
  • Patriot Viper PV593 4 TB: 14,500 MB/s read, 14,000 MB/s write
  • Patriot Viper PV573 2 TB: 14,000 MB/s read, 12,000 MB/s write
  • Transcend MTE250s 2 TB (this drive): 7,100 MB/s read, 6,500 MB/s write

In practice, 7 GB/s-class reads boot Windows, install games and stream DirectStorage assets with no perceptible penalty against 7,400 MB/s flagships, and the 2GB DRAM cache keeps random access responsive under multitasking. The 420K random-write rating is modest next to Phison E18-based flagships such as Kingston's KC3000, but desktop, gaming and mixed creator workloads rarely probe that ceiling. For video editors the sustained post-cache write floor matters more than burst, and here the 2TB model holds up well; queue-depth-1 4K work remains controller-bound, as on every NVMe drive. The same run's high-queue random results — roughly 650K read and 660K write IOPS at Q32T16 — indicate the official 530K/420K ratings are conservative rather than optimistic.

Transcend MTE250s vs Competitors

See how the MTE250s stacks up against other M.2 4.0 x 4 drives in our database:

Endurance, TBW & Warranty

Transcend backs the MTE250S 2TB with a five-year limited warranty rated to 1,560 TBW, whichever arrives first — a 0.43 drive-writes-per-day endurance class that comfortably covers desktop workloads. At a steady 20 GB of writes per day, the budget stretches past two centuries, so the warranty term is the realistic limit, not the flash. That rating doubles the 1TB model's 780 TBW and halves the gap to the 4TB's 3,120, making the 2TB the balance point of the ladder. TechPowerUp lists MTBF at 3.0 million hours; treat that as a fleet statistic rather than a promise about any single unit. Claims run through Transcend's regional support network with proof of purchase, and the bundled SSD Scope utility tracks remaining life, health and firmware so wear surfaces early rather than at failure.

Transcend MTE250s 2 TB Specifications

Category Value
Capacity [?] 2 TB
Interface [?] M.2 4.0 x 4
Controller [?] SMI SM2264F
Memory type [?] Kioxia 112-L TLC
DRAM [?] Yes
Read speed (MB/s) [?] 7100
Write speed (MB/s) [?] 6500
Read IOPS [?] 530000
Write IOPS [?] 420000
Endurance (TBW) [?] 1560
MTBF (million hours) [?] 3000000
Warranty (years) [?] 5

Verdict: Is the MTE250s Worth It in 2026?

Buy the Transcend MTE250S 2TB when a Gen4 system needs a slim, DRAM-equipped drive with an endurance budget most rivals don't match — thin laptops, small-form-factor builds and PS5 storage all fit. ssd-tester's bench of this exact model confirms the ratings translate into real transfers, with sequential results landing within half a percent of spec. Skip it if raw speed decides the purchase: Samsung's 990 Pro and WD's SN850X outrate it, and where a finned cooler fits the build, the aluminum-clad MTE250H sibling does the same job with better sustained cooling. Kingston's KC3000 is the alternative for maximum rated throughput. We think the graphene-thin profile, verified DRAM hardware and 1,560 TBW endurance make this the family's most flexible capacity.

+ Pros

  • Rated 7,100/6,500 MB/s on PCIe 4.0
  • 1,560 TBW endurance, five-year warranty
  • 2GB DDR4 DRAM cache confirmed by teardown
  • Graphene pad keeps height at 3.77 mm
  • Holds roughly 1,800 MB/s writes after cache
  • Kioxia BiCS5 112-layer TLC NAND

- Cons

  • Reads rate 300 MB/s under 7,400 MB/s flagships
  • Random-write rating trails DRAM-based KC3000 rivals
  • 1TB variant gives up 300 MB/s of writes
  • Double-sided PCB needs 3.77 mm of clearance
  • Graphene sheds less heat than finned aluminum

3.1 / 5 · 29 votes

Buy this or similar SSD Storage:

Samsung 980 Pro 2 TB

-57% $165
List Price: $379.99

Buy on Amazon

Video Review

Transcend Announces MTE250S High Performance M 2 NVMe Gen 4 SSD

Frequently Asked Questions

Yes, with one caveat. The drive meets Sony's published requirements: PCIe 4.0 NVMe, a 7,100 MB/s read rating well above the 5,500 MB/s recommendation, and total thickness inside the 110 x 25 x 11.25 mm envelope even with the graphene pad fitted. Sony does not list the MTE250S on its tested-and-recommended page, but independent databases such as ssd-tester.com mark it PS5-compatible. Because the graphene layer is far thinner than a finned heatsink, some console builders add a low-profile aluminum cooler on top; the drive still fits with room to spare.

For a gaming PC, comfortably. Reads at this class load games and levels with no perceptible difference versus 7,400 MB/s flagships, 2TB holds an operating system plus a large rotating library, and the DRAM cache keeps random access responsive when games, launchers and background apps share the drive. The 1,560 TBW endurance budget also absorbs years of install and uninstall cycles without nearing its limit. The rated 420K random-write IOPS trails flagship controllers, but game loading is dominated by read patterns, so the practical difference is negligible.

Yes — TechPowerUp's teardown of the 2TB MTE250S found 2GB of Samsung DDR4-3200 serving as the DRAM cache beside Silicon Motion's SM2264F controller. That separates it from DRAM-less Gen4 drives such as the WD Black SN770, which lean on Host Memory Buffer instead. A hardware DRAM cache holds the flash translation table on the drive itself, keeping random-access latency predictable even when system memory is under pressure from other tasks. The DB row here originally said no DRAM, which the teardown disproves.

The 2TB model is rated at 1,560 TBW under a five-year limited warranty, whichever comes first. Transcend's official endurance ladder assigns 780 TBW to the 1TB, 1,560 TBW to this 2TB and 3,120 TBW to the 4TB, all at 0.43 drive writes per day across the warranty term. At a steady 20 GB of daily writes, the 1,560 TBW budget lasts well over two centuries, so the five-year warranty, not flash wear, is the practical limit for virtually any desktop workload.

Same platform, different cooling. The MTE250S carries a graphene pad: 3.77 mm tall and 10 grams, the sensible choice for slim laptop slots or a PS5 where height is tight. The MTE250H bolts on a finned aluminum heatsink — 9.2 mm tall and considerably heavier — which Transcend says cuts drive temperatures by roughly 15 percent, making it the desktop pick. Speeds, endurance and warranty are identical per capacity, so slot clearance and cooling preference should decide, not the spec sheet.

The SN770 is DRAM-less and leans on Host Memory Buffer; the MTE250S carries a 2GB DDR4 cache. Rated speed favors the Transcend on both ends: 7,100 MB/s reads and 6,500 MB/s writes against the SN770's 5,150/4,900. Endurance differs sharply too — Transcend assigns 1,560 TBW here, while WD rates the SN770 2TB at 1,200 TBW. The WD usually wins on shelf price and availability; the Transcend wins on hardware, endurance and the bundled SSD Scope toolkit.

Transcend's per-capacity ratings are slightly uneven: the 1TB peaks at 7,200 MB/s reads but 6,200 MB/s writes, this 2TB at 7,100/6,500, and the 4TB at 7,500/6,700. Lower-capacity variants sometimes read marginally faster because fewer NAND packages shorten signal paths, while larger capacities gain write speed from more die interleaving. In real use the differences sit inside measurement noise — capacity choice should follow endurance budgets and storage needs, not a 100 MB/s spread on a spec sheet.

Comments

  • Be the first to comment.

Comments are reviewed before they appear.